How many of us are actually paying attention to what we watch on television these days? I mean, really, are you very meticulous about what is allowed to be viewed in your home? What types of programming do you find entertaining and/or appropriate for all ages? Think about that for a moment.
Yesterday, I picked up a story regarding the decency rules implemented on network TV as opposed to what’s appropriate on cable television programming. The topic came up because I have been in the midst of a very random experiment of living day-to-day without using a television. Impossible it seems? Right, I know, but it’s actually been a great deal easier than anticipated. W
ith the news and headlines being so depressing and so negative lately, I decided to take a break and experience devoting myself to other media outlets or cutting them all off completely. For the last 2-3 weeks, it’s worked and I’ve been quite successful at it. Then came along this story.
The whole premise behind the issue that started my television sabbatical is in the heart of a federal appeals court’s decision to strike down against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last week and update its latest standards on profanity, obscenity and indecency. With notices of reported “fleeting expletives” on our local and national radio stations and even on television, it looks like the First Amendment is being violated and abused since vague policies were adopted in 2004. That same policy reportedly could inhibit free speech as well.
Now to all of you viewers who recall the debauchery and disastrous element of Janet Jackson’s Super Bowl breast-baring wardrobe malfunction (I still think it was purely an accident, to be honest) that started all of this discussion, you might be wondering what’s going to happen from here.
Cable television continues to push the envelope further into obscenity while parents are worrying more about their children’s navigation methods on the internet rather than being exposed to curse words on network TV. But does it make a difference? Obscenity restrictions on network TV and cable need to be taken to heart because it’s obviously affecting us all, but who’s most responsible – the FCC, the television content providers or the parents who allow their children to view and are “entertained” by the very programming in question? You tell us.
For more details on the story, visit NYTimes.com today. Let us know how you feel and how you believe this will all impact how much television you and your family will be watching together. Rate this story with a thumbs up or a thumbs down or simply login and post your thoughts in the comments section below.
Share your thoughts with us here at TheBuzzCincy.com – the online home of 1230AM WDBZ The Buzz. Link up with Cincinnati’s community and inspiration station by checking us out on TheBuzzCincy.com. Let us know here or check out the conversations with 1230AM WDBZ‘s network of friends on on Facebook, or join our group page here – 1230AM WDBZ The Buzz Group Page.
Tell us what you enjoy most about our coverage and post your comments below right here at TheBuzzCincy.com – the online home of 1230AM WDBZ The Buzz, Cincinnati’s community and inspiration station.
Foodie Friday’s: BlaCk Coffee
Should Immigrants Get Fast-Tracked To Citizenship If They Join The Military? | What’s Your Point?
Foodie Friday’s: King’s Corona Latin Kitchen & Cantina
"Poor Little Tink Tink" Murders His Girlfriend!
The Lincoln Ware Show
Joe Burrow Scores $7.5M Home near Mt. Washington
Mississippi GOP’s Rogue Court Set To Begin As Judge Rejects Last-Ditch Effort To Halt Project
Election Day: What You Need to Know